This message is being forwarded to many associated parties, keep this in mind when responding to this message.
First of all, I'd like to apologize to all of you who I convinced to go based on my assumption that there was a first, second, and third place trophy in the Mazda class. While I can't do anything to make up for "my" mistake, I do however have a defense. It wasn't my fault.
An email from "Fred" of "Slipstream" dated Sept 19th 2005 stated the following:
Quote:
Trophy Categories:
...
Best Mazda - 1st ($500 Cash Prize), 2nd, 3rd
...
How was I to know that there was only going to be a single winner? Last year there were three. In fact, I won second place behind Seth. (cymfc3s) I, like many of you have been wondering, an event sponsored by Mazda, at Mazda's own track, has first, second, and third just for Civics alone. In total, there were SEVEN trophies for Hondas. ONE for Mazda. Absurd.
This is why many of us do not participate in any other shows, why bother going to Hot Import Nights or any of the other Honda fests if there is no incentive to go? They say there is no demand, no one shows up anyway. Why bother having a Mazda class in the first place? Catch 22. If MNAO wants to get Mazda enthusiasts out there, this event should have been the one to do it.
This event left a sour taste in a lot of people's mouths, and is an embarrassment for all those involved. Not just in planning, but all companies affiliated.
While I'm not trying to say that I should have placed at all, there has been some heated discussions about who should have won first place.
This is the car that won. While not my taste, overall the car is put together cleanly. He won per one official because of his "audio" and he had some "engine mods".
Personally, I don't see how ANY car can win a category with stock rims, unless you're the only one to show up for a class (that MR2). No disrespect to the owner, but that car should not have won.
This car is practically the same. Same bodykit, similar spoiler, similar hood, engine mods, ECU, audio.
Personally I think this one is the nicer of the two, the wheels really help the look.
If an RX-8 had to win, this one looks nicer than both of those. (opinion, I know) It's not about looks though, I guess. Points are all that matters.
It may have been worth going just to watch the races, but at least for the group I was in, we didn't get to see a whole lot. Judging was to start at noon, so after watching several laps under yellow and picking up some lunch, we sat by our cars. For two and a half hours we sat in the sun, baking, waiting for someone to come by. How was anyone to know what mods we had (Stan and I, the two FCs) if no one asked? I've been a victim of several break-ins and I don't want the public to know what, if anything is on the car, so I left the hood and trunk closed. We waited, and waited. It appeared as though no one came.
My TurboII:
Stan's TurboII:
I only got photos of the rotary powered cars, but there were several other Mazda cars there. Most of them left in disgust immediately after the trophies were awarded.
On my way out, I got an empathetic response, that things will be made right. I do appreciate that but I don't know what can be done now, the event is over. I don't know that I'd be willing to drive five hours to do it over again.
The phrase "On any given weekend, there are more Mazdas racing on the racetracks, dragstrips and parking lots of America than any other brand of vehicle" might be true, but it is going to be a long time before shows such as this catch on with our crowd. That's just fine with me, maybe I'll stick to the track. Tacking gaudy body panels, sprawling excessive vinyl, and hundreds of pounds of audio just doesn't do it for me. Maybe I shouldn't even bother finishing my 95 RX-7, there won't be a venue for it.
Justin
1985 Mazda RX-7 GSL-SE
1989 Mazda RX-7 TurboII
1995 Mazda RX-7 BASE
200X Mazda RX-8 Mazdaspeed?